The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v. Trinity Western University

To book an interview, click on the "Book an Interview" button on any page at ADFmedia.org.
Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Description:  The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society attempted to deny accreditation to Trinity Western University’s law school because of its biblical beliefs on appropriate sexual behavior.


Christian law school standing strong after win at Nova Scotia Court of Appeals

Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society can’t deny accreditation to Trinity Western University law school for its beliefs about sexual behavior
Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Attorney sound bite:  Brett Harvey

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia – The Nova Scotia Court of Appeals Tuesday upheld a trial court’s decision which found that the province’s Barristers’ Society doesn’t have the authority to deny accreditation to Trinity Western University’s law school because of its biblical beliefs on appropriate sexual behavior. The decision comes after a ruling from an appeals court in Ontario in June found the opposite, creating a split decision that may increase the odds that the case is destined for the Supreme Court of Canada.

TWU filed a lawsuit in October 2014 against NSBS after it refused to recognize TWU graduates as lawyers unless the school changed its policy on sexual activity and marital fidelity. TWU requires its students, faculty, and staff to refrain from having premarital sex or engaging in sex outside of a marriage relationship between one man and one woman.

“Christian universities and schools should be free to operate according to the very faith they teach and believe,” said Gerald Chipeur, Q.C., of the Canadian firm Miller Thompson, LLP, and one of more than 3,000 private attorneys allied with Alliance Defending Freedom. “The court accurately affirmed that the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society has improperly denied accreditation by attempting to regulate outside of its jurisdiction—and did so simply because the law school and its students adhere to their sincerely held religious beliefs.”

“Nothing in the Legal Profession Act authorizes the Society to issue an independent ruling that someone has violated Nova Scotia’s Human Rights Act. Nor does the Human Rights Act…, as amended, contemplate the Society’s intervention…,” the Nova Scotia Court of Appeals wrote in its decision in The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v. Trinity Western University. “It is inconceivable that the Legislature, without expressing a supportive word in either the Legal Profession Act or the Human Rights Act, intended that the Society’s Council could assert for itself an autonomous jurisdiction concurrent with that of a human rights board of inquiry.”

Alliance Defending Freedom has provided support to the work of a team of allied attorneys representing multiple groups that filed briefs and presented oral argument in support of TWU.

“As the court recognized, the Barristers’ Society clearly overstepped its bounds,” explained ADF Senior Counsel Brett Harvey. “The society’s job is to accredit based on competency, not on their collective distaste for Christian beliefs about human sexuality. No Canadian law gives an accreditation body the power to discriminate on that basis.”
 
  • Pronunciation guide: Chipeur (CHIP’-yur)

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
 
# # # | Ref. 46659

Additional resources: The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society v. Trinity Western University

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Previous news releases:

  • 2015-01-30: Canadian court upholds religious freedom of law students

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at ADFmedia.org.