Additional resources: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Previous news releases:

  • 2019-08-26: Broad support filed with US Supreme Court against judicial redefinition of ‘sex’ to mean ‘gender identity’
  • 2019-08-16: ADF to Supreme Court: Redefining ‘sex’ problematic, not job of judges, govt agencies
  • 2019-04-22: US Supreme Court to weigh in on whether EEOC, courts can redefine ‘sex’ without Congress
  • 2018-07-20: ADF asks US Supreme Court to weigh in on whether EEOC and court can redefine ‘sex’ without Congress
  • 2018-03-07: 6th Circuit: Feds can strong-arm those who minister to the grieving
  • 2017-10-03: Michigan funeral home asks appeals court to uphold respectful dress code for employees
  • 2016-08-18: Funeral home buries federal govt in Michigan religious freedom case
  • 2016-08-10: Feds say political strong-arming more important than respecting grieving families
  • 2016-04-08: ADF: Govt shouldn’t strong-arm those who minister to the grieving

Commentary:

  • John Bursch: Difficult issues involving human sexuality require dialogue, not scorn, misinformation (The Hill, 2019-10-15)
  • John Bursch: Race and sex are fundamentally different. That should matter to SCOTUS (National Law Journal, 2019-10-10)
  • Michael Farris: Pivotal issue for Supreme Court: Who has the power to make the rules? (Inside Sources, 2019-10-08)
  • Maureen Collins: How a Supreme Court case about a funeral home could affect Christians across the nation (Christian Post, 2019-10-08)
  • Jay Hobbs: In Harris Funeral Homes Supreme Court case, we should ask ‘Am I next?’ (Ricochet, 2019-10-07)
  • John Bursch: Gender ideologues, bureaucrats and judges take aim at small businesses (Acton Institute, 2019-10-02)
  • John Bursch: What the ACLU didn’t tell you at the Emmys about the Harris Supreme Court case (Washington Examiner, 2019-09-26)
  • John Bursch: Much at stake in transgender Supreme Court case (Detroit News, 2019-09-25)
  • John Bursch: SCOTUS must reaffirm the meaning of ‘sex’ in antidiscrimination law (National Review, 2019-08-19)
  • John Bursch: This lawsuit over ‘sex’ and ‘gender identity’ will have sweeping implications (Daily Signal, 2019-07-26)
  • Thomas Rost: I did what was best for my business. Will the Supreme Court punish me for it? (Washington Post, 2019-07-03)
  • John Bursch: HHS restores legal meaning of ‘sex’—what will US Supreme Court, Congress do? (The Hill, 2019-06-13)
  • Kristen Waggoner: The Left preaches diversity while forcing conformity through culture and courts (The Federalist, 2019-06-11)
  • Kristen Waggoner: Bureaucrats shouldn’t be involved in gender politics at funeral homes (Daily Caller, 2019-05-01)
  • Jeana Hallock: SCOTUS to rule on whether men can wear women’s clothes on the job (The Federalist, 2019-04-29)
  • Thomas Rost: EEOC uses my funeral homes to rewrite laws (Detroit News, 2019-04-25)
  • David Cortman: Keep the government out of the grieving process (National Review, 2019-04-23)
  • Jay Hobbs: Should grieving families be forced to deal with a cross-dressing funeral home employee? (Daily Caller, 2018-11-25)

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at ADFmedia.org.