Davis v. Shade

To book an interview, click on the "Book an Interview" button on any page at ADFmedia.org.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Description:  A lawsuit sought to uproot a Ten Commandments monument on the Allegany County courthouse grounds that is nearly identical to one the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2005. A resident of a neighboring county who owns property in Allegany County filed the lawsuit to have the monument removed because he claimed “he is offended” by it.


Ten Commandments monument in Maryland county will stay

ADF, Jones Day attorneys represented Allegany County in defense of monument identical to one US Supreme Court upheld in 2005
Tuesday, August 16, 2016

BALTIMORE – A Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Allegany County courthouse that is nearly identical to one the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2005 will stay in place after the offended person who sued to uproot it dropped his lawsuit Tuesday.

Alliance Defending Freedom and Jones Day attorneys represent the Allegany County commissioners and in June had filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, but Jeffrey Davis, who resides in a neighboring county but owns property in Allegany County, decided to drop his suit without specifying his reason for doing so.

“The emotional response of an offended passerby doesn’t automatically amount to a violation of the Establishment Clause,” said ADF Senior Counsel Brett Harvey. “Mr. Davis was right to end his quest to uproot this monument, which is virtually identical to a monument in Texas that the U.S. Supreme Court already upheld. Because the county’s monument would survive constitutional scrutiny, we are pleased that it will be able to stay.”

In 1957, the Fraternal Order of Eagles donated the monument, which stands not far from a monument to George Washington. In its 2005 decision in Van Orden v. Perry, the high court upheld the constitutionality of a nearly identical monument, also donated by FOE, on the grounds of the Texas Capitol complex. The court ruled that the monument did not violate the Establishment Clause.

In its 2014 ruling in the ADF case Town of Greece v. Galloway, the Supreme Court questioned the legitimacy of “offended observer” claims, saying that adults “often encounter speech they find disagreeable; and an Establishment Clause violation is not made out any time a person experiences a sense of affront from the expression of contrary religious views….”

Jones Day attorneys Noel Francisco, James Uthmeier, and Kaytlin Roholt are co-counsel on behalf of the county commissioners in the case, Davis v. Shade, which the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland has agreed to dismiss.

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
 
# # # | Ref. 55625

Additional resources: Davis v. Shade

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Previous news releases:

  • 2016-06-27: Maryland county asks court to dismiss flawed lawsuit against Ten Commandments monument

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at ADFmedia.org.