Additional resources: Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Monday, January 11, 2021

Previous news releases:

  • 2020-04-30: Broad support for US Supreme Court to reject Pittsburgh’s censorship zones
  • 2020-03-26: Sidewalk counselors ask US Supreme Court to review Pittsburgh censorship-zone law
  • 2019-10-18: Appeals court rules Pittsburgh censorship zones can’t exclude pro-life sidewalk counselors
  • 2019-02-05: ADF returns to 3rd Circuit, argues Pittsburgh censorship zones suppress free speech
  • 2018-04-13: ADF to 3rd Circuit: Pittsburgh censorship zones must go
  • 2018-01-12: Challenge to Pittsburgh censorship zones heads to appeals court again
  • 2017-11-16: Appeal likely of district court decision upholding Pittsburgh censorship zones
  • 2016-06-01: 3rd Circuit reinstates lawsuit against Pittsburgh censorship zones
  • 2015-11-05: ADF to 3rd Circuit: Pittsburgh censorship zones hurt women, violate free speech
  • 2015-03-26: ADF to 3rd Circuit: Pittsburgh censorship zones violate free speech
  • 2015-03-06: ADF considering appeal of ruling that keeps Pittsburgh censorship zones in place
  • 2014-12-02: Court to consider whether Pittsburgh can enforce censorship zones
  • 2014-09-05: ADF files suit against Pittsburgh censorship zones
Commentary:
  • John Bursch: Censoring pro-life speech is unconstitutional (National Review, 2020-12-08)
  • John Bursch: Constitution doesn't allow special burdens on pro-life speech, US Supreme Court should say so (The Hill, 2020-12-02)
  • Maureen Collins: Pro-life sidewalk counselors ask Supreme Court to protect rights (My Christian Daily, 2020-03-30)
  • Greg Scott: Yes, Pittsburgh, the First Amendment applies to pro-life people, too (Ricochet, 2016-06-03)

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at ADFmedia.org.