Grimmark v. Landstinget i Jönköpings Län

To book an interview, click on the "Book an Interview" button on any page at
Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Description:  In November 2013, Höglandssjukhuset women’s clinic in Sweden rescinded a job offer as a midwife from Ellinor Grimmark after she explained that she could not perform abortions because of her conscientious objection and her Christian faith. The head of the maternity ward said that “she was no longer welcome to work with them” and questioned “whether a person with such views actually can become a midwife.” A few months later, Grimmark tried to obtain employment with Ryhovs women’s clinic, which told her that a person who refuses to perform abortions does not belong at a women’s clinic. Värnamo Hospital’s women’s clinic offered Grimmark a job but then withdrew employment because of the complaint she filed against Höglandssjukhuset. The head of the hospital told Grimmark that no employee was allowed to publicly take a stand against abortion.

Swedish appeals court fails to protect freedom for health professionals

Court says medical staff can’t abide by their consciences, midwife considers appeal to European Court of Human Rights
Wednesday, April 12, 2017

JÖNKÖPING, Sweden – The Swedish Appeals Court decided Wednesday that the government can force medical professionals to perform abortions, or else be forced out of their profession. Because the ruling in Grimmark v. Landstinget i Jönköpings Län contradicts international law protecting conscientious objection, Ellinor Grimmark, a Swedish midwife, is now considering whether to take her case to the European Court of Human Rights.

Three different medical clinics unjustly denied Grimmark employment because she will not assist with abortions. In Sweden, midwives are essentially nurses who specialize in pregnancy and child birth.

“Participation in abortions should not be a requirement for employment as a medical professional. In accordance with international law, the court should have protected Ellinor’s fundamental right to freedom of conscience,” said ADF International Director of European Advocacy Robert Clarke. “For that reason, Ellinor is considering an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.”

Three different medical clinics in the district of Jönköping refused to employ Grimmark because she would not assist with abortions in light of her convictions about the dignity of all human life. Despite this, in November 2015, a district court found that her right to freedom of conscience had not been violated. That court required her to pay the local government’s legal costs, amounting to 100,000 euros (the equivalent of nearly $106,000). ADF International filed an expert brief in support of her case, highlighting international protections for freedom of conscience.

“The desire to protect life is what leads many midwives and nurses to enter the medical profession in the first place,” Clarke said. “Instead of forcing desperately needed midwives out of their profession, governments should safeguard the moral convictions of medical staff. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has affirmed that ‘no person, hospital or institution shall be coerced, held liable, or discriminated against in any manner because of a refusal to perform, accommodate, assist, or submit to an abortion.’ As a member state, Sweden must be held to its obligation to respect this freedom.”

ADF International is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
# # # | Ref. 44753

Additional resources: Grimmark v. Landstinget i Jönköpings Län

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Previous news releases:

  • 2015-11-12: Swedish court rules midwife must assist with abortions to be employed
  • 2014-07-09: Swedish midwife denied employment for being pro-life

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at