Additional resources: National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Wednesday, January 08, 2020

Previous news releases:

  • 2018-10-26: Permanent end to Calif. law that forced pro-life centers to advertise for abortion
  • 2018-06-26: US Supreme Court: Govt can’t force Americans to express messages they disagree with
  • 2018-06-26: US Supreme Court: Govt can’t force people to express messages they disagree with
  • 2018-03-20: Michael Farris’s remarks following Supreme Court oral arguments in NIFLA v. Becerra
  • 2018-03-19: ADF to take stand for free speech at US Supreme Court Tuesday
  • 2018-03-14: House honors selfless work of pregnancy centers for women, their babies
  • 2018-03-14: ADF responds to California: Govt shouldn’t force pro-life centers to advertise for abortion
  • 2018-03-12: California, coerced speech, and the Court: A panel discussion on NIFLA v. Becerra
  • 2018-02-21: California AG defends forcing pro-life centers to advertise for abortion
  • 2018-01-17: Broad support against forcing pro-life centers to advertise for abortion
  • 2018-01-08: Pro-life centers to Supreme Court: Don’t allow govt to force us to advertise for abortion
  • 2017-11-13: US Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on California law that forces pro-life centers to promote abortion
  • 2017-03-20: ADF asks US Supreme Court to halt California law forcing pro-life centers to promote abortion
  • 2016-10-28: ADF asks 9th Circuit to preserve freedom for pro-life pregnancy centers
  • 2016-10-14: 9th Circuit upholds California law forcing pro-life centers to promote abortion
  • 2016-06-13: ADF to 9th Circuit: Halt California law forcing pro-life centers to promote abortion
  • 2015-10-13: Calif. law forces pro-life centers to promote abortion, ADF files suit


  • Anne O’Connor: The case for pre-abortion ultrasound laws (Washington Examiner, 2020-01-08)
  • Heidi Matzke: California’s law targeting pregnancy centers was meant for harm—but God used it for good (Pregnancy Help News, 2018-12-04)
  • Jim Campbell: Compelled speech in Masterpiece Cakeshop: What the Supreme Court’s June 2018 decisions tell us about the unresolved questions (Federalist Society Review, 2018-09-24)
  • Denise Harle: NIFLA decision affirms First Amendment’s purpose: Protect minority viewpoints (JURIST, 2018-07-15)
  • Jay Hobbs: SCOTUS NIFLA decision gives women the help they need and the hope they deserve (CNS News, 2018-07-02)
  • Jessica Prol Smith: Why all Americans can celebrate the Supreme Court ruling on forced abortion advertising (The Federalist, 2018-06-28)
  • Kevin Theriot: Supreme Court: People lose when the government decides which ideas prevail (National Review, 2018-06-27)
  • Elissa Graves: Supreme Court’s NIFLA decision: Our government can’t force you to share a message you don’t agree with (Fox News, 2018-06-27)
  • Michael Farris: We should all celebrate the Supreme Court ruling on compelled speech, regardless of our views on abortion (Los Angeles Times, 2018-06-27)
  • Denise Burke: Supreme Court ruling means it’s still legal to be pro-life and help expectant mothers (Washington Examiner, 2018-06-26)
  • Jay Hobbs: Think the Supreme Court is done with free speech post-Masterpiece? Think again. (Daily Wire, 2018-06-21)
  • Denise Harle: Government should not force private pregnancy centers to be at odds with their mission (San Diego Union-Tribune, 2018-04-12)
  • Jim Campbell: Justice Kennedy’s views on pro-life speech tested this term (National Review, 2018-03-23)
  • Kristen Waggoner: Thwarting pro-life pregnancy centers (Washington Times, 2018-03-20)
  • James Gottry: Supreme Court must act to protect free speech on subject of abortion (The Hill, 2018-03-20)
  • Michael Farris: Pro-life pregnancy centers shouldn't be forced to promote abortion (Kentucky Today, 2018-03-20)
  • Maggie Amos: Pregnancy centers shouldn’t have to advertise for abortions. I’m glad mine didn’t. (USA Today, 2018-03-20)
  • Thomas Glessner: Pro-life pregnancy centers should not have to advertise abortion (National Review, 2018-03-20)
  • Michael Farris: Supreme Court should not allow California to force pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion (Fox News, 2018-03-20)
  • James Gottry: Pro-life centers have speech, too (Wall Street Journal, 2018-03-19)
  • Elissa Graves: Supreme Court should uphold free speech of pro-life pregnancy centers (Sacramento Bee, 2018-03-13)
  • Sarah Kramer: Should this pregnancy clinic be forced to advertise abortion? (Christian Post, 2018-02-22)
  • Anne O’Connor: The greedy abortion industry vilifies pro-life centers (The Hill, 2018-02-15)
  • Kevin Theriot: Upcoming Supreme Court case reveals California’s slapshot at pro-life speech rights (Washington Examiner, 2018-01-26)
  • James Gottry: What if March for Life participants were forced to advertise for Planned Parenthood? (The Hill, 2018-01-18)
  • James Gottry: Supreme Court to decide if FACT Act hacks away at First Amendment (National Review, 2017-11-16)
  • Kevin Theriot: Supreme Court should strike down California’s forced-advertising law (National Review, 2017-04-03)

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at