Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education

To book an interview, click on the "Book an Interview" button on any page at
Friday, December 29, 2017

Description:  Township High School District 211 in Palatine, Illinois, disregarded student privacy and safety when it secretly opened its schools’ restrooms to the opposite sex and then opened the girls’ locker room to a boy after the U.S. Department of Education threatened the district’s federal funding. The agency based its threat on its inaccurate interpretation of Title IX, a 1972 federal law whose accompanying regulations, contrary to the agency’s opinion, actually authorize schools to retain single-sex restrooms and locker rooms.  Read more >>

Illinois families considering appeal after court declines to protect student privacy

ADF attorneys represent 51 families concerned about male student in girls’ locker rooms
Friday, December 29, 2017

CHICAGO – A federal court Friday declined to temporarily stop an Illinois school district from enforcing policies that authorize a male student to use the girls’ locker rooms. Because the decision allows an ongoing risk of privacy violations while the case continues in court, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing 51 families say that they are considering an immediate appeal.

“School policies should promote the rights and safety of all students, no matter who they are, but the school district placed its political preferences ahead of that and ahead of the law,” said ADF Senior Counsel Gary McCaleb. “Because the court should have suspended the district’s privacy-violating policies, we will likely appeal.”

The district opened its schools’ restrooms to the opposite sex—without informing parents—and then opened the girls’ locker room to a boy after the Obama administration’s Department of Education threatened the district’s federal funding. Under the Trump administration, the agency rescinded the Obama administration’s attempt to rewrite federal law and restored the longstanding interpretation of Title IX.

That 1972 federal law prohibits schools from discriminating “on the basis of sex,” which for more than 40 years has meant “male” or “female.” Title IX’s existing regulations specifically state that a school receiving federal funds can “provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex” without putting that funding at risk.

ADF attorneys represent families consisting of more than 130 students and parents in the lawsuit, Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

“Any safety and privacy policy must respect the needs of all children because every child matters,” McCaleb said. “No child should be forced into an intimate setting—like a locker room—with another child of the opposite sex, and no school should impose a policy that so clearly violates the right to bodily privacy. Parents have a right to protect their children’s privacy, and the district must listen to the parents and students they are paid to serve.”
  • Case snapshot: Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
# # # | Ref. 53376

Additional resources: Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Friday, December 29, 2017

Previous news releases:

  • 2017-06-20: Federal agencies dropped from student privacy lawsuits
  • 2017-02-22: Trump takes important first step to protect privacy and dignity of students across America
  • 2016-10-18: Illinois families: Court should reject magistrate’s recommendation to ignore student privacy
  • 2016-08-12: 51 Illinois families make their case to halt invasion of student privacy, federal overreach
  • 2016-05-25: Federal overreach jeopardizes students’ privacy
  • 2016-05-04: 51 families sue feds, Chicago-area school district for violating student privacy
  • 2016-05-03: 50 Palatine-area families to announce lawsuit against US DOE, school district
  • 2015-10-20: Illinois school district on solid ground to respect children’s privacy

  • Jeremy Tedesco: The difference between privacy rights in abortion and same-sex locker rooms cases (Daily Signal, 2016-07-21)
  • Matt Sharp: ACLU misses mark on student ignoring it (Chicago Tribune, 2016-05-25)
  • Matt Sharp: No, federal law does not require entities to allow men into women’s restrooms (CNS News, 2016-04-26)
  • Matt Sharp: Girls sharing showers with boys at public schools (CNS News, 2015-12-15)

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at