Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

To book an interview, click on the "Book an Interview" button on any page at
Friday, January 12, 2018

Description:  A Pittsburgh censorship zone ordinance allows the creation of hundreds of censorship zones throughout the city that ban leafleting and other free speech around the facilities of abortionists, eye doctors, dentists, and any “therapeutic,” “healing,” or “health-building” treatment services.

Challenge to Pittsburgh censorship zones heads to appeals court again

ADF attorneys appeal lower court ruling that upheld speech ban despite 3rd Circuit’s concerns
Friday, January 12, 2018

Attorney sound bite:  Kevin Theriot

PITTSBURGH – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed an appeal Thursday of a federal district court’s ruling that last month kept in place Pittsburgh’s censorship zone ordinance even after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit expressed great concern over the zones and reinstated the lawsuit challenging them.

The 3rd Circuit found that “the Ordinance imposes the same kind of burden on speech” as one the U.S. Supreme Court struck down in 2014. The ordinance bans free speech around the facilities of abortionists and even eye doctors, dentists, and any “therapeutic,” “healing,” or “health-building” treatment providers.

“The government can’t censor pro-life speech simply because some pro-abortion politicians or activists demand it,” said ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot. “The district court should have applied what the Supreme Court made clear in 2014—that free speech receives the highest protection on public sidewalks. Because the city cannot justify silencing the peaceful offers of help that the sidewalk counselors we represent offer to women, we have appealed the district court’s decision.”

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously struck down a similar Massachusetts law in McCullen v. Coakley, a case ADF attorneys and allied attorneys filed in 2008. Following that ruling, ADF attorneys successfully challenged censorship zones in Madison, Wisconsin.

“This case calls for nothing more than a straightforward application of McCullen—the Ordinance imposes the same kind of burden on speech, the same less burdensome options are available, and the City has similarly failed to try or to consider those alternatives to justify its Ordinance…,” the 3rd Circuit wrote in June 2016. “The recent instruction from McCullen and the factual allegations of the Complaint combine to require that we vacate the District Court’s grant of the City’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ free speech claims…. We reverse so that the Plaintiffs’ claims may be aired and assessed by the standard that McCullen now requires.”

ADF attorneys filed the lawsuit, Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh, in 2014 on behalf of pro-life individuals who haven’t been allowed to speak or engage in sidewalk counseling within the zones. Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto is enforcing the law, which he voted for as a city councilman in 2005.

Under the ordinance, no one may “knowingly congregate, patrol, picket or demonstrate in a zone extending 15 feet from any entrance to the hospital or health care facility” that the city designates. Health care facilities broadly and vaguely include any “establishment providing therapeutic, preventative, corrective, healing and health-building treatment services on an out-patient basis by physicians, dentists and other practitioners.”

Lawrence G. Paladin, Jr., one of more than 3,200 attorneys allied with ADF, is serving as local counsel in the case.
  • Pronunciation guide: Theriot (TAIR’-ee-oh), Bruni (BROON’-ee)

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
# # # | Ref. 46588

Additional resources: Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

Scroll down to view additional resources pertaining to this case and its surrounding issue.
Friday, January 12, 2018

Previous news releases:

  • 2017-11-16: Appeal likely of district court decision upholding Pittsburgh censorship zones
  • 2016-06-01: 3rd Circuit reinstates lawsuit against Pittsburgh censorship zones
  • 2015-11-05: ADF to 3rd Circuit: Pittsburgh censorship zones hurt women, violate free speech
  • 2015-03-26: ADF to 3rd Circuit: Pittsburgh censorship zones violate free speech
  • 2015-03-06: ADF considering appeal of ruling that keeps Pittsburgh censorship zones in place
  • 2014-12-02: Court to consider whether Pittsburgh can enforce censorship zones
  • 2014-09-05: ADF files suit against Pittsburgh censorship zones

  • Greg Scott: Yes, Pittsburgh, the First Amendment applies to pro-life people, too (Ricochet, 2016-06-03)

Legal documents, related news, and other related resources available in the right panel when this page is viewed at